Anti-game in interest zones

Question

Is it anti game to move the hazelnut crates of the other team out of the pantry to have interest points without using it later in the game. In the rules, it's written "If the goal is to harm without building, then it’s anti-game", it is not about building something but winning interest points so here's the question

Comments

(not an official answer)

Hi!

The consensus seems to be that winning interest points is considered to be constructive, so it is fair

Answer 1

GOOD EVENING,

Please, avoid as much as possible rules that border on anti-game, the referees around the table will be able to sanction you if they judge that this is the case.

Comments

Pourquoi n'y a t'il pas une règle claire par rapport à cette action ? Ça serait tellement plus simple

---

It is clear that the goal here is winning interest. It should not be considered as an anti-game action.